See our latest episode of Six Degrees of Jigsaw.
Here’s a brief we’ve seen a version of more than once:
Feature the product in the first few seconds. Avoid clothing with identifying brand marks. Include captions. Mention our tagline somewhere in the video. Tag our handle. Select two of these five key takeaways to highlight. Shoot in warm, natural light if you can. Oh, and make it “your own.”
Every ask in there is fair on its own, and none of it is a big lift. But stack all of it into a single brief, hand that brief to someone you hired specifically because their audience trusts their voice, and what comes back tends to be crowded. Not wrong, exactly. Just busy in a way that keeps anything from landing.
Creators are a tool in the box, and like any tool, most of the value is in knowing what it’s used for. Sure, you can drive a screw with a hammer if you use enough force. It’ll go in. It won’t hold, and you’ll have some damaged drywall while you’re at it. Over-scripting works about the same way. The video gets made, the deliverable comes in on time, but the thing you were paying for in the first place is gone.
More guidance feels like more control, and more control feels safer. In practice it runs the other way. Every instruction you add competes for the same 45 seconds of video, and the influencer ends up managing a checklist instead of making something of substance. By the time they make their way to the fifth or sixth inclusion, nothing reads clearly, because nothing was allowed to lead.
The best content an influencer ever made wasn’t approved by you.
The reason to work with an influencer or creator instead of running another awareness campaign is that their audience already trusts them, and that trust took years to build. It does not transfer with a contract. It lives in how they talk, and in what they’re willing to say out loud when nobody hands them a line. Load up the brief and you aren’t protecting any of that. You’re asking a person to speak for two brands at once, theirs and yours, and one of them is going to lose.
Say a creator is walking their audience through your service or product, filming as they go. Somewhere in the middle they mispronounce a word, or fumble the wording in a claim. A brief with no room in it turns that into a full reshoot, a new production date, and a delivery timeline that slides past the campaign it was built for. A brief built around a single clear goal, showing people this is easier than they expect, turns the same mistake into a fifteen-second patch. Re-record the line as a VO, drop it in, done. The walkthrough still feels real, and the creator still sounds like themselves.
That’s the line between guiding and dictating. Guiding means telling an influencer what the video needs to accomplish and trusting them to get there their own way. Dictating means handing over a script with no room to adjust and hoping the result still feels natural. Spoiler, it doesn’t.
If the brief has to work, give it a single job to do well instead of five or six at once. Name the thing that matters most, something like this takes ten minutes, not an afternoon, and let the creator build around it. Every ask past that is competing with it for attention.
None of this means handing over your brand and hoping for the best. It means putting your input where it belongs: in the brief, before anyone starts rolling, where you set what matters and leave the execution to the person you hired for it. Somebody who understands what you need will protect your brand better than a script ever could, because they’ll catch things you never thought to write a rule for.
The best outcome of any influencer partnership is a brief that is no longer necessary. When you find that person, the smartest move is also the easiest: work with them again. Repeat partnerships build a shorthand no document can replicate, and audiences notice when a creator keeps coming back to a brand on their own.
So cut the brief down. Say what has to land, and let somebody who spent years earning that audience decide how to say it.